See the Full Picture
AskVerdict captures every claim, challenge, and rebuttal as a rich argument structure — not just a transcript. Explore how conclusions are reached, not just what they are.
Every argument, claim, and rebuttal — visualized as a live graph
Unlike ChatGPT or Perplexity
Most AI tools give you a paragraph. AskVerdict shows you the reasoning structure — the specific claims made, the challenges raised, and the evidence cited. You see exactly why the verdict reached its conclusion.
Capabilities
Explore Arguments Your Way
Every tool you need to make sense of a complex debate.
Filter by Agent, Type, or Status
Instantly narrow the graph to claims from a specific agent, a particular argument type (support, challenge, rebuttal), or completion status. Spot patterns a linear transcript would hide.
Click-Through Evidence
Every node links to the underlying evidence: source citations, document references, agent reasoning. Nothing is a black box.
Full-Screen Exploration
Expand the graph to full screen for deep dives. Pan, zoom, and drag nodes to arrange the layout that makes sense to you.
Export as PNG
Download a high-resolution image of the argument graph to include in reports, presentations, or stakeholder docs.
How It Works
From Question to Graph
Ask Your Question
Pose any decision or question. AskVerdict selects specialized agents and kicks off the debate.
Agents Debate
Multiple AI agents argue, cross-examine, and surface challenges — every argument is recorded.
Explore the Graph
Navigate the full argument graph. Click any node, filter by agent, and follow evidence trails.
Smart Filtering
Focus on what matters
With large debates involving many agents and hundreds of claims, filtering is essential. Pin an agent, isolate challenges, or view only unresolved nodes — the graph responds instantly.
- Filter by agent perspective
- Filter by claim type (support / challenge / rebuttal)
- Filter by confidence level
- Search within argument text
Deep Evidence
Nothing is a black box
Click any node in the graph to see the full claim, the evidence cited, which agent made it, and how other agents responded. Every verdict is fully auditable.
- Source citations and document references
- Agent reasoning and confidence
- Cross-examination history
- Linked rebuttals and counter-claims
Claim
Remote work increases developer productivity by 13% on average.
Stanford research · 16,000 workers · 2023
Challenge
Study focused on single-task roles, not collaborative R&D environments.
Ready to see your reasoning clearly?
Argument graphs are available on the free plan. Start your first debate today.