We Believe Decisions Deserve Better
One AI giving you one answer is no better than flipping a coin with extra steps. We built AskVerdict to end that — by making AI models argue with each other until the truth surfaces.
Mission
Why One Model Isn't Enough
Every AI assistant you use today gives you a single perspective. Ask GPT-4 whether you should take the job offer, and it'll tell you what it thinks — confidently, completely, and potentially completely wrong.
AskVerdict is built on a different premise: the best way to stress-test an idea is to have smart adversaries challenge it. We deploy up to 8 specialized AI agents — a Devil's Advocate, a Risk Analyst, a First Principles Thinker, a Domain Expert, and more — and have them rigorously debate both sides of your question. They cross-examine each other's claims, cite evidence, assign confidence scores, and synthesize their findings into a structured verdict.
The result isn't just an answer. It's a map of the decision space — with the strongest arguments on each side clearly visible and all the reasoning on the table.
Our Story
Born From Decision Fatigue
The team at GLINCKER was building productivity tools when we noticed a pattern: people weren't struggling to find information — they were drowning in it. Every AI tool produced confident-sounding answers, but those answers contradicted each other depending on how you phrased the question.
We asked: what if instead of one model giving one answer, we built a framework where multiple models had to defend their positions against each other? The first prototype ran two agents in a structured debate. The quality of the output was immediately and dramatically better than any single-model response we'd seen. AskVerdict was born.
Today, AskVerdict powers decisions ranging from career pivots and investment theses to product strategy and architectural choices. The engine supports configurable agent roles, outcome tracking with Brier score calibration, argument graph visualization, and document-grounded debates — all built on a conviction that reasoning in public, under adversarial pressure, is the closest thing we have to truth.
Values
What We Stand For
These aren't marketing words. They're the constraints we design around.
Transparency
Every agent's reasoning is fully visible. No black-box verdicts — you see every argument, every challenge, every piece of evidence that shaped the outcome.
Rigor
Multiple specialized agents argue opposing sides and cross-examine each other. We don't stop at surface-level pros and cons — we go until the logic breaks or holds.
Privacy
BYOK keys are never stored server-side — they exist in memory for the duration of a single request only. Your sensitive decisions stay yours.
Simplicity
The most consequential decisions deserve the most rigorous analysis — wrapped in an interface simple enough that you can go from question to verdict in minutes.
Founder
Built by GLINCKER
AskVerdict is a product of GLINCKER — a software studio focused on tools that augment human judgment. We believe technology should make you more capable, not more dependent. AskVerdict is our answer to AI tools that think for you, rather than with you.
Stack
Built With Intention
Every technology choice was made to serve rigor, speed, and privacy.
Multi-Agent Engine
TypeScript debate orchestrator
Hono + Bun
Edge-ready API, sub-ms latency
SSE Streaming
Real-time debate unfolding
Argument Graphs
Visual reasoning structure
Postgres + pgvector
Calibrated outcome tracking
Next.js + Vercel
Global edge delivery
Get Started
Start Making Better Decisions
Free forever. No card required. Your first debate is three minutes away.