⌘K
Best Practices
Tips for writing effective questions, choosing debate modes, and getting the most out of AskVerdict.
2 min read
Share
Get the most out of AskVerdict with these tips for writing questions, choosing modes, and interpreting verdicts.
Writing Good Questions
Be Specific
| Poor | Better |
|---|---|
| "What database should we use?" | "Should we use PostgreSQL or MongoDB for our e-commerce order system?" |
| "Is this a good idea?" | "Should we launch the MVP now or wait for feature X?" |
| "Help with our strategy" | "Should we focus on B2B or B2C for our AI product in 2026?" |
Include Context
Context dramatically improves verdict quality:
bash
# Without context — generic answer
askverdict debate "Should we hire remotely?"
# With context — specific, actionable answer
askverdict debate "Should we hire remotely?" \
--context "Series A startup, 12 people in SF office, hiring 5 engineers, roles are backend and ML. Current team values in-person collaboration. Budget is tight."Frame as Decisions
AskVerdict works best with clear decision points:
- "Should we X or Y?" — comparison
- "Should we do X?" — go/no-go
- "Is X the right approach for Y?" — evaluation
Choosing Modes
Fast (1 credit)
Use for:
- Quick sanity checks
- Binary yes/no decisions
- High-volume batch processing
- Screening before deeper analysis
Balanced (3 credits)
Use for:
- Standard business decisions
- Feature prioritization
- Vendor selection
- Most everyday decisions
Thorough (8 credits)
Use for:
- Strategic decisions with long-term impact
- Decisions involving significant investment
- When you need to present analysis to stakeholders
- Complex multi-factor decisions
Interpreting Verdicts
Confidence Scores
- 80+ — Strong signal. One side is clearly stronger.
- 60-79 — Good direction but with caveats. Read the reasoning carefully.
- 40-59 — Genuinely close call. Consider running a Thorough mode or adding more context.
- Below 40 — The question may need reframing, or both options are equally valid.
When to Disagree
AskVerdict provides analysis, not orders. Disagree when:
- You have information the AI doesn't (internal politics, personal relationships)
- The confidence is low and your intuition is strong
- Domain expertise gives you insight the model lacks
Workflow Tips
Chain Debates
Break complex decisions into parts:
- "Should we enter market X?" → If yes:
- "Should we build or acquire to enter market X?" → If build:
- "Should we hire a team or use contractors to build for market X?"
Track Outcomes
Use outcome tracking to learn which types of questions get the best results:
bash
# Record what you actually decided
askverdict outcomes record dbt_abc123 --result "Chose PostgreSQL, deployed in March"Batch Analysis
For portfolio or screening use cases:
bash
# Analyze multiple options
for option in "React" "Vue" "Svelte"; do
askverdict debate "Should we use $option for our dashboard?" \
--mode fast --json >> analysis.jsonl
doneReview your past verdicts periodically. Understanding where the AI was right and wrong helps you calibrate how much weight to give future verdicts.
Was this page helpful?