Debate Modes
Every debate mode in AskVerdict AI, what it does, and when to use it.
AskVerdict offers 8 debate modes split into two categories: Decision Frameworks for structured analysis and Fun Modes for creative, engaging takes on your question.
All Modes
Standard
Classic balanced debate
Six Hats
De Bono's six perspectives
Delphi
Expert consensus method
Pre-mortem
Failure analysis
Roast
Brutally honest feedback
Shark Tank
Investor panel pitch
ELI5
Simple answers
Devil's Advocate
Stress-test ideas
Decision Frameworks
Structured analytical approaches for real decisions.
Standard
The default mode. An Advocate argues for, a Critic argues against, and specialists weigh in. Best for general-purpose decisions where you want balanced, thorough analysis.
Six Thinking Hats
Based on Edward de Bono's method. Six agents each take a different cognitive perspective - facts, emotions, caution, optimism, creativity, and process. Best for complex decisions that benefit from multiple viewpoints.
Delphi Method
Five anonymous expert agents independently analyze your question, then converge toward consensus through multiple rounds. Best for forecasting, estimation, and questions where expert agreement matters.
Pre-mortem
Assumes the decision has already failed, then works backward. A Pessimist, Realist, and Optimist each explain why. Best for risk assessment and stress-testing plans before committing.
Fun Modes
Same structured insights, presented in more engaging formats.
Roast
A ruthless Roaster tears your idea apart while a Defender tries to save it. You get a Roast Score (0-100) and brutally honest feedback. Best for gut-checking ideas when you want unfiltered criticism.
Shark Tank
Four AI investors evaluate your idea on unit economics, market size, technical feasibility, and risk. Each shark votes In or Out, and you get a Deal or No Deal verdict. Best for business ideas and pitches.
ELI5
Breaks down complex topics into simple, jargon-free language with analogies. Gives you a clear Yes/No/Maybe answer and a one-line explanation a five-year-old could understand. Best for sanity-checking complicated decisions.
Devil's Advocate
An aggressive counter-arguer attacks every assumption in your position while a Steel Man defends it. You get a Position Strength score showing how well your argument held up. Best for stress-testing strongly held beliefs.
Choosing the Right Mode
| Situation | Recommended Mode |
|---|---|
| General decision | Standard |
| Need multiple perspectives | Six Thinking Hats |
| Want expert consensus | Delphi |
| Evaluating risk | Pre-mortem |
| Want honest criticism | Roast |
| Business or product idea | Shark Tank |
| Complex topic, need clarity | ELI5 |
| Testing a strong opinion | Devil's Advocate |
Not sure which to pick?
Start with Standard. It works well for most decisions. You can always re-run the same question in a different mode to get a fresh perspective.
Was this page helpful?