Debate Modes

Every debate mode in AskVerdict AI, what it does, and when to use it.

2 min readUpdated Mar 10, 2026
Share

AskVerdict offers 8 debate modes split into two categories: Decision Frameworks for structured analysis and Fun Modes for creative, engaging takes on your question.

All Modes

Standard

Classic balanced debate

Six Hats

De Bono's six perspectives

Delphi

Expert consensus method

Pre-mortem

Failure analysis

Roast

Brutally honest feedback

Custom

Shark Tank

Investor panel pitch

Custom

ELI5

Simple answers

Custom

Devil's Advocate

Stress-test ideas

Custom

Decision Frameworks

Structured analytical approaches for real decisions.

Standard

The default mode. An Advocate argues for, a Critic argues against, and specialists weigh in. Best for general-purpose decisions where you want balanced, thorough analysis.

Six Thinking Hats

Based on Edward de Bono's method. Six agents each take a different cognitive perspective - facts, emotions, caution, optimism, creativity, and process. Best for complex decisions that benefit from multiple viewpoints.

Delphi Method

Five anonymous expert agents independently analyze your question, then converge toward consensus through multiple rounds. Best for forecasting, estimation, and questions where expert agreement matters.

Pre-mortem

Assumes the decision has already failed, then works backward. A Pessimist, Realist, and Optimist each explain why. Best for risk assessment and stress-testing plans before committing.

Fun Modes

Same structured insights, presented in more engaging formats.

Roast

A ruthless Roaster tears your idea apart while a Defender tries to save it. You get a Roast Score (0-100) and brutally honest feedback. Best for gut-checking ideas when you want unfiltered criticism.

Shark Tank

Four AI investors evaluate your idea on unit economics, market size, technical feasibility, and risk. Each shark votes In or Out, and you get a Deal or No Deal verdict. Best for business ideas and pitches.

ELI5

Breaks down complex topics into simple, jargon-free language with analogies. Gives you a clear Yes/No/Maybe answer and a one-line explanation a five-year-old could understand. Best for sanity-checking complicated decisions.

Devil's Advocate

An aggressive counter-arguer attacks every assumption in your position while a Steel Man defends it. You get a Position Strength score showing how well your argument held up. Best for stress-testing strongly held beliefs.

Choosing the Right Mode

SituationRecommended Mode
General decisionStandard
Need multiple perspectivesSix Thinking Hats
Want expert consensusDelphi
Evaluating riskPre-mortem
Want honest criticismRoast
Business or product ideaShark Tank
Complex topic, need clarityELI5
Testing a strong opinionDevil's Advocate

Not sure which to pick?

Start with Standard. It works well for most decisions. You can always re-run the same question in a different mode to get a fresh perspective.

Was this page helpful?